Building Argumentation Systems on Set Constraint Logic

نویسندگان

  • Rolf Haenni
  • Norbert Lehmann
چکیده

The purpose of this paper is to show how the theory of probabilistic argumentation systems can be extended from propositional logic to the more general framework of set constraint logic. The strength of set constraint logic is that logical relations between non-binary variables can be expressed more directly. This simplifies the classical way of modeling knowledge through propositional logic. Building argumentation systems on set constraint logic is therefore useful for improving its capabilities of expressing different forms of uncertain knowledge.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Representing Argumentation Schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)

We present a high-level declarative programming language for representing argumentation schemes, where schemes represented in this language can be easily validated by domain experts, including developers of argumentation schemes in informal logic and philosophy, and serve as executable specifications for automatically constructing arguments, when applied to a set of assumptions. Since argumenta...

متن کامل

Gorgias-C: Extending Argumentation with Constraint Solving

GORGIAS-C is a system implementing a logic programming framework of argumentation that integrates together preference reasoning and constraint solving. The framework of argumentation with preference reasoning [1, 2] was first implemented in the GORGIAS system3 which has mainly been used in the multi-agent domain [2–4], medical informatics [5] and network security [6]. We have extended this fram...

متن کامل

On Enforcing a Constraint in Argumentation

This paper addresses the issue of enforcing a constraint in an argumentation system. The system consists in (1) an argumentation framework, the structure of which is made up of a set of arguments and of an attack relationship, (2) an acceptability semantics, and (3) acceptable sets of arguments, computed from (1) and (2). An agent may want another agent to consider a new attack, or to have a gi...

متن کامل

ConArg: a Tool to Solve (Weighted) Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with (Soft) Constraints

ConArg is a Constraint Programming-based tool that can be used to model and solve different problems related to Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). To implement this tool we have used JaCoP, a Java library that provides the user with a Finite Domain Constraint Programming paradigm. ConArg is able to randomly generate networks with small-world properties in order to find conflict-free, admi...

متن کامل

Argument-based Constraint Logic-Programming in Satisfiability Modulo CHR

We revise classical results in Argumentation-based Logic Programming, e.g., Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), under the umbrella of Satisfiability Modulo CHR. Through this language it is possible to reason on arguments and have an underlying theory solver to implement resolution of conflicts. Strict and defeasible rules, as well as certainty scores associated with such rules (e.g., Possibili...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000